I. Patentability
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. A. Patentable inventions
  7. 4. Two-hurdle approach G 1/19
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

A. Patentable inventions

Overview

4. Two-hurdle approach G 1/19

In G 1/19 (OJ 2021, A77), the Enlarged Board set out what is referred to as the two-hurdle approach: the twofold test for patent eligibility and for inventive step (using the COMVIK criteria). The Enlarged Board stated that a shift may have taken place in the relative level of each of these two hurdles in the sense that it has become easier to clear the eligibility hurdle of Art. 52 EPC and more difficult to pass the inventive step hurdle of Art. 56 EPC. This chapter relates to the first hurdle; for the question of technicality in relation to Art. 56 EPC, see chapter I.D.9.2. The two-hurdle approach de facto entails three questions: (i) the invention’s eligibility under Art. 52 EPC, (ii) whether a feature contributes to the technical character of the invention and (iii) whether the invention is based on an inventive step vis-à-vis the closest prior art (G 1/19).

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility