5. Assessment of technical character
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. A. Patentable inventions
  7. 5. Assessment of technical character
  8. 5.2. Concept of technical character in the case law
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5.2. Concept of technical character in the case law

Overview

5.2. Concept of technical character in the case law

Even in their leading decisions (G 3/08 date: 2010-05-12, G 2/07, G 1/19), the boards of appeal do not explicitly define in the case law how they understand the concept of technical character. Nor does the EPC prohibit the patenting of inventions that consist of a mix of technical and non-technical features. It is not necessary to give a relative weighting to technical and non-technical features. If the invention defined in the claim uses technical means, it can be patented provided it meets the requirements of Art. 52 to 57 EPC (T 26/86). In G 1/19 the Enlarged Board held that a method involving technical means is an invention within the meaning of Art. 52(1) EPC. This approach has sometimes been described as the "any technical means" or "any hardware" approach (G 3/08 date: 2010-05-12).

5.2.1 Apparatus
5.2.2 Methods
5.2.3 Technical considerations and technical implementations
Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility