3. Closest prior art
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. D. Inventive step
  7. 3. Closest prior art
  8. 3.8. Further criteria for determining the closest prior art
  9. 3.8.2 Confidential disclosure in the application
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3.8. Further criteria for determining the closest prior art

Overview

3.8.2 Confidential disclosure in the application

In T 211/06 the examining division used as a starting point for the assessment of inventive step background art indicated in the application, which according to the applicant comprised confidential information. The board stated that prior art meant publicly available art at the priority date, and not some internal prior art known only within the company employing the inventors. A disclosure in the application as filed which turns out not to be prior art under Art. 54(2) EPC 1973 cannot be used as a starting point for assessing inventive step, nor can subjective "laboratory practice" put forward by the examining division without any objective evidence that this was knowledge available to the public be used as a starting point for assessing inventive step.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility