9. Assessment of inventive step
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. D. Inventive step
  7. 9. Assessment of inventive step
  8. 9.2. Problem-solution approach when applied to mixed-type inventions
  9. 9.2.17 Logistics
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

9.2. Problem-solution approach when applied to mixed-type inventions

Overview

9.2.17 Logistics

In T 696/06 the application concerned a data processing system intended to facilitate confronting an offer and a demand in the field of transporting travellers or goods. Essentially the system executed business processes and transactions, like mediating offers and demands, which were typical for a transportation broker or freight exchange service and which the board held not to be technical.

In T 912/05 the application related to a mail delivery system that could deliver by physical and/or electronic means. The board held that methods of mail delivery can qualify as inventions if they involve "technical means", with mail delivery by e-mail qualifying as such.

In T 1806/20 the application concerned a parcel delivery system that sought to prevent damage to water-sensitive parcels by avoiding delivery to rainy destinations. The board found that the requirement to ensure that parcels do not get damaged by water formed part of the non-technical logistics scheme.

In T 1594/20, the board held that an arithmetic optimisation for efficiently dividing up a picking order did not necessarily bring about a simulation of the underlying physical operation (the transport of goods in this case) but also included purely deterministic mathematical optimisations.

Asserted energy savings were purely speculative and could not readily lead to a technical effect being acknowledged. For this, any such effect would have to be achieved using technical means. In the claimed subject-matter, however, energy savings (if any) would be the result of a purely organisational or algorithmic optimisation based essentially on a mental act. No technical effect can be derived from this to acknowledge inventive step.

T 1960/20 related to an invention tracking how quickly a warehouse employee enters and exits the proximity of a warehouse robot waiting for them. The board considered that understanding and analysing spatial and temporal conditions under which the steps of the established business workflows are carried out is per se a non-technical exercise.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility