1.3. Standard for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. II. Patent application and amendments
  6. E. Amendments
  7. 1. Article 123(2) EPC
  8. 1.3. Standard for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  9. 1.3.6 Criteria not relevant for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC
  10. a) Indication in the description that subject-matter is known to the skilled person
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

1.3.6 Criteria not relevant for assessing compliance with Article 123(2) EPC

Overview

a) Indication in the description that subject-matter is known to the skilled person

In T 903/16 the examining division had argued that the original disclosure did not indicate or imply that the devices described therein could be new and inventive and had considered the later claiming of such devices as an infringement of Art. 123(2) EPC. The board emphasised that the fact that in the application the disclosed range of devices is stated to be within the means known to the skilled person may be considered when examining other EPC requirements, but it has no bearing on the question of disclosure for the purposes of Art. 123(2) EPC.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility