4. Late submission of documents, lines of attack and arguments
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. IV. Proceedings before the departments of first instance
  6. C. Opposition procedure
  7. 4. Late submission of documents, lines of attack and arguments
  8. 4.5. Criteria for the exercise of discretion
  9. 4.5.5 Legitimate expectation that the document is already in the proceedings
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.5. Criteria for the exercise of discretion

Overview

4.5.5 Legitimate expectation that the document is already in the proceedings

In T 68/02 document D16 was discussed extensively by the respondent without objecting to its admission into the proceedings. At the start of the oral proceedings before the opposition division the respondent requested that the document not be admitted into the proceedings. The opposition division as a consequence did not admit the document. The board could not agree with the action of the opposition division in this respect. The discussion of the document by the respondent and the opposition division before the oral proceedings took place led to the normal expectation that the document was already in the proceedings. See also T 1194/08.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility