4.6. Diagnostic methods
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. B. Exceptions to patentability
  7. 4. Medical methods
  8. 4.6. Diagnostic methods
  9. 4.6.1 Opinion G 1/04 and its application in case law
  10. c) Clarity of a claim relating to diagnostic methods
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.6.1 Opinion G 1/04 and its application in case law

Overview

c) Clarity of a claim relating to diagnostic methods

In G 1/04 the Enlarged Board found as follows: If diagnosis as the deductive medical or veterinary decision phase was a purely intellectual exercise, the feature pertaining to the diagnosis for curative purposes and the features relating to the preceding steps which were constitutive for making the diagnosis represented the essential features of a diagnostic method. Thus, in order to satisfy the requirements of Art. 84 EPC 1973, an independent claim relating to such a method had to include these features. If a non-technical feature was to be regarded as constitutive for defining the invention, it had likewise to be included as an essential feature in the independent claim.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility