9. Assessment of inventive step
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. I. Patentability
  6. D. Inventive step
  7. 9. Assessment of inventive step
  8. 9.21. Examples of lack of inventive step
  9. 9.21.4 Reversal of procedural steps
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

9.21. Examples of lack of inventive step

Overview

9.21.4 Reversal of procedural steps

In T 1/81 (OJ 1981, 439) the board held that in the absence of other features that from a technical point of view would contribute to patentability, the sequence in which the socket and pipe connection in the case in hand was made did not suffice to impart inventive step to the method claimed. The mere reversal of procedural steps in the production of component parts could not provide justification for inventive step.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility