1. Article 123(2) EPC – added subject-matter
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. II. Patent application and amendments
  6. E. Amendments
  7. 1. Article 123(2) EPC
  8. 1.12. Errors in the disclosure
  9. 1.12.3 Amendment based on erroneous figure in the disclosure
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

1.12. Errors in the disclosure

Overview

1.12.3 Amendment based on erroneous figure in the disclosure

In T 740/91 the board allowed a change in the upper limit of a range from 5 % to 0.6 %. The value of 0.6 % was explicitly disclosed in example IV. However, the patentee conceded that this figure had been inserted in error in place of the true figure of 0.49 %. The board concluded that the fact that the figure was wrong did not alter the fact that it was actually and credibly disclosed in the application as filed. It could thus be relied on as the basis for the new upper limit. This interpretation was consistent with the underlying intention of Art. 123(2) EPC 1973, which was to protect the public from being faced at a later stage with claims which were wider in their scope than what had been disclosed in the application as filed, and published for the information of the public, including the applicant's competitors.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility