2. Article 123(3) EPC – extension of the protection conferred
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. II. Patent application and amendments
  6. E. Amendments
  7. 2. Article 123(3) EPC
  8. 2.4. Deletions and replacements
  9. 2.4.3 Deletion of examples for a general feature in a claim
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.4. Deletions and replacements

Overview

2.4.3 Deletion of examples for a general feature in a claim

The board in T 1052/01 took the view that deleting examples given in claim 1 as granted (here "valve, restrictor, etc.") for a general feature (here "hydraulic functional unit") did not extend the protection conferred, as these examples were embraced by the general feature which determined the extent of the protection conferred.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility