5.2. Shifting the burden of proof
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. G. Law of evidence
  7. 5. Burden of proof
  8. 5.2. Shifting the burden of proof
  9. 5.2.2 Cases in which the burden of proof was reversed
  10. g) Common general knowledge of the skilled person
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

5.2.2 Cases in which the burden of proof was reversed

Overview

g) Common general knowledge of the skilled person

In T 2070/13, as to the burden of proof, serious doubts were set out concerning whether the skilled person's common general knowledge would be sufficient to enable him to carry out the invention. As a consequence, the burden of proof shifted to the patentee. The mere assumption that anti-adherence of the claimed groups of compounds was known, and the reference to post-published D16 referring to a particular bacterial non-adhesion, was not convincing evidence that could discharge the respondent (patentee) from its burden of proof.

In relation to proof of common general knowledge, see in particular chapter I.C.2.8.5.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility