J. Suspected partiality
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. J. Suspected partiality
  7. 3. Admissibility
  8. 3.4. No objection to the board as a whole
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

3. Admissibility

Overview

3.4. No objection to the board as a whole

In T 2440/16 of 17 May 2022 date: 2022-05-17 the board held that an objection under Art. 24 EPC must always be directed at specific members of the board. Partiality is a characteristic of an individual person and therefore cannot be ascribed to a deciding body per se but only to its members.

In T 1966/17 the board held that appellant 2's suspicion of partiality of all the board members simply because they did not agree with its submissions and because they expressed a different opinion could not support its allegation of partiality. To the contrary, such reasoning could not be considered to be based on the objective criteria relating to partiality as indicated in G 1/05 (OJ 2007, 362, point 20 of the Reasons). For this reason alone, i.e. the lack of substantiation, the objection of partiality was found to be inadmissible.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility