6. Suspected partiality of members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. III. Rules common to all proceedings before the EPO
  6. J. Suspected partiality
  7. 6. Suspected partiality of members of the Enlarged Board of Appeal
  8. 6.2. Petition for review proceedings under Article 112a EPC
  9. 6.2.3 Expressions of preliminary opinions
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

6.2. Petition for review proceedings under Article 112a EPC

Overview

6.2.3 Expressions of preliminary opinions

In R 2/12 of 26 September 2012 date: 2012-09-26 the objection of suspected partiality was derived exclusively from the communication by which the petitioner was informed of the Enlarged Board's provisional opinion on the petition. The Enlarged Board found it would be incompatible with an objective assessment of a case and with the principle of a fair trial in inter partes proceedings, if a board member could be 'deposed' on the ground that they did not opine in favour of a particular party right from the beginning of the proceedings. See also in this chapter III.J.5.3.1.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility