4.2. Amendment to a party's case
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. A. Appeal procedure
  7. 4. New submissions on appeal
  8. 4.2. Amendment to a party's case
  9. 4.2.3 Second and third levels of the convergent approach: amendments to a party's appeal case
  10. c) Request for dismissal of the appeal and maintenance of the patent
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.2.3 Second and third levels of the convergent approach: amendments to a party's appeal case – Article 13(1) and (2) RPBA

Overview

c) Request for dismissal of the appeal and maintenance of the patent

In T 1309/16 the patent proprietor had not submitted any reply to the opponent's grounds of appeal and, instead, only requested, about one month before the oral proceedings, that the appeal be dismissed and the patent maintained. The board observed that the primary purpose of the appeal proceedings was to judicially review the contested decision which had rejected the opposition (Art. 12(2) RPBA) and the patent proprietor did not have to request the appeal's dismissal for that to happen. The board considered that there was no need to decide whether the patent proprietor's request was formally admissible under Art. 13(2) RPBA.

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility