4.4. Second level of the convergent approach – submissions made after filing of grounds of appeal or reply – Article 13(1) RPBA
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. A. Appeal procedure
  7. 4. New submissions on appeal
  8. 4.4. Second level of the convergent approach
  9. 4.4.6 Discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

4.4.6 Discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA – new facts, objections, arguments and evidence

Overview

4.4.6 Discretion under Article 13(1) RPBA – new facts, objections, arguments and evidence

a) Time of filing – whether the new submissions should have been filed earlier
b) Suitability to solve the issues raised
c) Prima facie relevance for assessment of patentability
d) Whether the amendment is detrimental to procedural economy
e) Complexity of the amendment
Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility