J 0016/94 (Notice of appeal) of 10.06.1996
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1996:J001694.19960610
- Date of decision
- 10 June 1996
- Case number
- J 0016/94
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 93203101.6
- IPC class
- A61K 38/25
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- Decision in English
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- Method of enhancing mental function
- Applicant name
- APPLIED RESEARCH SYSTEMS ARS HOLDING N.V.
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.1.01
- Headnote
For a notice of appeal to comply with Article 108, first sentence, and Rule 64(b) EPC, it must express the definite intention to contest an appealable decision. An appeal filed as a subsidiary request, i.e. subject to the condition that the main request be allowed by the first instance, is therefore inadmissible.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 106(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 109 1973European Patent Convention R 64(b) 1973European Patent Convention R 65 1973
- Keywords
- Form of appeal - admissible (no)
- Catchword
- -
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.