T 0324/90 (Re-establishment) of 13.03.1991
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1991:T032490.19910313
- Date of decision
- 13 March 1991
- Case number
- T 0324/90
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 83109035.2
- IPC class
- C08L 81/02
- Language of proceedings
- English
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- Decision in English
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Phillips Petroleum
- Opponent name
- Hoechst
- Board
- 3.3.03
- Headnote
In order to comply with the two-months' time limit laid down in Article 122(2) EPC, it is not necessary that the application for re-establishment of rights provide any prima facie evidence for the facts set out in it, nor is it necessary that it indicate the means by which those facts are supported (e.g. medical certificates, sworn statements and the like). Such evidence may be submitted after the time limit, if so required.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 108 1973European Patent Convention Art 122 1973
- Keywords
- Re-establishment of rights
Prima facie evidence
All due care (no)
Unsatisfactory system - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- J 0008/95J 0037/97J 0011/09J 0012/09J 0013/09J 0014/09J 0005/11J 0006/11J 0001/22J 0006/22T 0516/91T 0239/92T 0667/92T 0682/92T 0488/93T 0878/95T 0148/96T 0301/96T 0690/98T 0543/99T 0511/02T 0902/05T 1401/05T 1130/06T 0257/07T 0261/07T 1042/07T 1764/08T 1553/13T 2265/18T 1513/21T 1874/23
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
1. The application for re-establishment of rights is rejected.
2. The appeal is rejected as inadmissible.
3. The application for reimbursement of the appeal fee is rejected.