2. European qualifying examination
  1. Home
  2. Legal texts
  3. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal
  4. Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the European Patent Office
  5. V. Proceedings before the Boards of Appeal
  6. C. Proceedings before the Disciplinary Board of Appeal
  7. 2. European qualifying examination
  8. 2.4. Setting, marking and grading
  9. 2.4.1 Setting and marking the pre-examination
Print
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email

2.4. Setting, marking and grading

Overview

2.4.1 Setting and marking the pre-examination

From the entry into force of the REE on 1 January 2025, the pre-examination according to the REE 2009 and the IPREE 2018 is no longer held (Art. 25(6) REE).

The pre-examination was a single paper (R. 10(2) IPREE 2018), set in multiple-choice form. In several decisions, the DBA held statement 5.4 in the German version of the 2016 pre-examination paper to have been unclear and confusing. In some cases (e.g. D 1/16, D 4/16 and D 15/16), the additional points awarded resulted in the candidate achieving the "PASS" grade. Challenges to other statements in the same paper were, however, rejected (e.g. D 5/16, D 6/16, D 10/16). In D 5/16 the board concluded with some general remarks, as follows. It was essential to ensure that the questions to be answered and any statements to be evaluated in a multiple-choice examination such as the EQE pre-examination were formulated clearly and unambiguously. It was crucial to formulate statements in such a way that clearly only one "True" or "False" answer was possible and "correct" in the circumstances (see also D 6/16, later decision D 3/19, citing D 13/02 and D 2/24). However, concerning the ambiguity of words and the relevance of the factual context of questions, if a question was logical and made sense, so that, using common sense, it was clear what answer was expected, candidates could not rely on exceptions to the rule or explore alternative interpretations with a view to showing that a different answer might also be conceivable in specific instances. See also D 3/14 and e.g. D 2/21, reported in this chapter V.C.2.6.4 "Review of the marking of the pre-examination".

Previous
Next
Footer - Service & support
  • Service & support
    • Website updates
    • Availability of online services
    • FAQ
    • Publications
    • Procedural communications
    • Contact us
    • Subscription centre
    • Official holidays
    • Glossary
Footer - More links
  • Jobs & careers
  • Press centre
  • Single Access Portal
  • Procurement
  • Boards of Appeal
Facebook
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
Instagram
EuropeanPatentOffice
Linkedin
European Patent Office
EPO Jobs
EPO Procurement
X (formerly Twitter)
EPOorg
EPOjobs
Youtube
TheEPO
Footer
  • Legal notice
  • Terms of use
  • Data protection and privacy
  • Accessibility