T 0002/81 (Methylenebis(phenylisocyanate)) of 01.07.1982
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1982:T000281.19820701
- Date of decision
- 1 July 1982
- Case number
- T 0002/81
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 79101243.8
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Mobay
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.3.01
- Headnote
1. While it is inadmissible to combine unrelated or conflicting documents mosaically in order to deny inventive step, it is indeed permissible to consider various publications and information jointly to prove a prejudice or a general trend in the art pointing away from the invention.
2. The disclosure of a quantitative range of values (e.g. for concentrations or temperatures) together with an included preferred narrower range also directly discloses the two possible part-ranges lying within the overall range on either side of the narrower range. Hence a simple combination of the preferred narrower range and one of these part-ranges is also unequivocally derivable and is supported by the disclosure.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention Art 84 1973
- Keywords
- Disclosure
Inventive step - mosaically
Inventive step - range preferred narrower
Mosaicking
Support by description - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0650/90T 0036/91T 0614/92T 0656/92T 0731/94T 0474/96T 0522/96T 0947/96T 1063/96T 1094/96T 0164/97T 0727/98T 0925/98T 0931/98T 0118/99T 0323/99T 0344/99T 0510/99T 0268/00T 0436/00T 0593/00T 0946/00T 0667/02T 0674/02T 0981/02T 1052/02T 1170/02T 0157/03T 0327/03T 1197/03T 0133/04T 0259/04T 0740/04T 1270/04T 0028/05T 0173/05T 0795/05T 1215/05T 0578/06T 1107/06T 1114/06T 0040/07T 0066/07T 0094/07T 0453/07T 0482/07T 0956/07T 0192/09T 0612/09T 0027/10T 0985/10T 1451/10T 1990/10T 2001/10T 1177/11T 1256/11T 1626/11T 2159/11T 0249/12T 1258/12T 1320/13T 0688/14T 1680/14T 0703/16T 0776/16T 2700/16T 1176/17T 2608/17T 0025/18T 3032/18T 0014/19T 0355/19T 3253/19T 0605/20T 1477/21T 0563/22T 2241/22T 2242/22
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The decision of the Examining Division dated 19 November 1980 is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the first instance with the order to grant a European patent on the basis of the following documents...