T 0181/82 (Spiro compounds) of 28.02.1984
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1984:T018182.19840228
- Date of decision
- 28 February 1984
- Case number
- T 0181/82
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 80810093.7
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- CIBA GEIGY
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.3.01
- Headnote
I. An effect which may be said to be unexpected can be regarded as an indication of inventive step; where comparative tests are sub submitted as evidence of this, there must be the closest possible structural approximation - in a comparable type of use - to the subject-matter of the invention.
II. Only known substances - not notionally described ones - qualify for use in comparisons of compounds. Such substances include those which are the inevitable result of the starting materials and the process applied thereto, even if one of the two reactants manifests itself as a chemical entity (C1 alkyl bromide) from a group of generically defined compounds (C1 - C4 alkyl bromides) (see "Diastereomers" T 12/81, OJ EPO 1982,296).
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 112 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973
- Keywords
- Comparative tests - prerequisites therefor
Non-referral to Enlarged Board of Appeal
Inventive step unexpected effect - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0175/87T 0135/88T 0148/88T 0572/88T 0021/89T 0763/89T 0012/90T 0103/90T 0298/90T 0292/92T 0939/92T 0964/92T 1048/92T 0412/93T 0507/93T 0919/93T 1066/93T 0248/94T 0412/94T 0483/94T 0723/94T 0933/94T 0024/95T 0159/95T 0361/95T 0450/95T 0497/95T 0600/95T 0065/96T 0720/96T 0730/96T 0811/96T 0819/96T 0942/96T 0955/96T 0077/97T 0191/97T 0509/97T 1046/97T 1179/97T 0226/98T 0773/98T 0934/98T 0940/98T 0024/99T 0116/99T 0227/99T 0309/99T 0400/99T 0494/99T 0997/99T 1041/99T 1049/99T 1072/00T 0133/01T 0589/01T 1100/01T 0496/02T 0817/02T 0937/02T 0212/03T 0234/03T 0378/03T 0665/03T 0728/03T 0036/04T 0200/04T 0210/04T 0401/04T 0998/04T 1242/04T 0079/05T 0258/05T 0529/05T 0938/05T 0096/06T 0469/06T 0632/06T 0912/06T 0992/06T 1266/06T 0715/07T 1197/07T 1478/07T 1499/07T 1761/07T 1970/07T 0251/08T 0595/08T 0615/08T 1913/08T 2043/09T 2441/09T 0783/10T 0287/11T 0410/11T 0833/11T 1245/11T 0181/12T 1130/12T 2596/12T 2371/13T 1872/14T 0137/15T 0428/15T 0710/16T 2200/17T 2406/18
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
1. The appeal is dismissed.
2. The request for the case to be remitted to the Enlarged Board of Appeal is refused.