T 0482/89 (Power supply unit) of 11.12.1990
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T048289.19901211
- Date of decision
- 11 December 1990
- Case number
- T 0482/89
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 84401017.3
- IPC class
- H02M 3/335
- Language of proceedings
- French
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- TELEMECHANIQUE
- Opponent name
- Siemens Nixdorf
- Board
- 3.5.02
- Headnote
I. Under Article 117(1)(c) EPC, in any proceedings before, inter alia, an Opposition Division or a Board of Appeal, the means of giving or of taking evidence may include the production of documents. As the EPC neither defines the term "documents" nor gives any indication of the probative value of such documents, the principle of free evaluation of evidence applies. Any kind of document therefore, regardless of its nature, is admissible during proceedings, including appeal proceedings, before the European Patent Office. The probative value of any such document, however, depends on the peculiar circumstances of the particular case.
II. The principle of free evaluation of evidence also applies to the hearing of witnesses under Article 117(1)(d) EPC. In particular, the EPC does not rule out hearing an employee of one of the parties to the proceedings as a witness.
III. It is a principle well-established in the case law of the majority of Contracting States that a single sale is sufficient to render the article sold available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC, provided the buyer is not bound by an obligation to maintain secrecy. It is not necessary to prove that others also had knowledge of the relevant article.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 117(1)(c) 1973European Patent Convention Art 117(1)(d) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(2) 1973
- Keywords
- Lack of novelty on account of prior use
Sale without obligation to maintain secrecy
Documents produced by opponents admissible as evidence
Testimony of opponents' employee
New claim filed during oral proceedings inadmissible - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- G 0002/21J 0004/97J 0010/04T 0953/90T 0462/91T 0838/92T 0839/92T 0443/93T 0937/93T 0301/94T 0575/94T 0750/94T 0558/95T 0721/95T 0809/95T 0048/96T 0494/96T 0932/96T 0456/97T 0560/97T 0241/99T 0710/99T 1022/99T 0012/00T 0182/00T 0983/01T 0116/02T 0972/02T 1086/02T 1091/02T 1202/02T 0389/04T 0190/05T 0282/06T 1060/06T 1510/06T 1511/06T 1512/06T 1513/06T 1753/06T 0897/07T 1426/13T 0098/18T 2037/18
ORDER
For these reasons it is decided that:
The appeal is dismissed.