European Patent Office

T 0482/89 (Power supply unit) of 11.12.1990

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1990:T048289.19901211
Date of decision
11 December 1990
Case number
T 0482/89
Petition for review of
-
Application number
84401017.3
IPC class
H02M 3/335
Language of proceedings
French
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
TELEMECHANIQUE
Opponent name
Siemens Nixdorf
Board
3.5.02
Headnote

I. Under Article 117(1)(c) EPC, in any proceedings before, inter alia, an Opposition Division or a Board of Appeal, the means of giving or of taking evidence may include the production of documents. As the EPC neither defines the term "documents" nor gives any indication of the probative value of such documents, the principle of free evaluation of evidence applies. Any kind of document therefore, regardless of its nature, is admissible during proceedings, including appeal proceedings, before the European Patent Office. The probative value of any such document, however, depends on the peculiar circumstances of the particular case.

II. The principle of free evaluation of evidence also applies to the hearing of witnesses under Article 117(1)(d) EPC. In particular, the EPC does not rule out hearing an employee of one of the parties to the proceedings as a witness.

III. It is a principle well-established in the case law of the majority of Contracting States that a single sale is sufficient to render the article sold available to the public within the meaning of Article 54(2) EPC, provided the buyer is not bound by an obligation to maintain secrecy. It is not necessary to prove that others also had knowledge of the relevant article.

Keywords
Lack of novelty on account of prior use
Sale without obligation to maintain secrecy
Documents produced by opponents admissible as evidence
Testimony of opponents' employee
New claim filed during oral proceedings inadmissible
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

The appeal is dismissed.