G 0003/08 (Referral by the President of the EPO in relation to a point of law pursuant to Article 112(1)(b) EPC) of 16.10.2009

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2009:G000308.20091016
Date of decision: 16 October 2009
Case number: G 0003/08
Petition for review of: -
Application number: -
IPC class: -
Language of proceedings: English
Distribution: Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
Download: Decision in English
OJ versions: No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case: G 0003/08 Computerprogramme 2010-05-12 G 0003/08 Programs for computers 2010-05-12 G 0003/08 Programmes d'ordinateur 2010-05-12
Abstracts for this decision: -
Application title: -
Applicant name: -
Opponent name: -
Board: -
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions: [2002] EWCA Civ 90, [2003] QB 528 - Taylor v. Lawrence; [2003] UKHL 35, [2003] ICR 856 - Lawal v. Northern Spirit Ltd.; Locabail (UK) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties LtdEuropean Patent Convention Art 24 European Patent Convention Art 24 1973 European Patent Convention Art 4
Keywords: Objection to a member of the EBA, suspicion of partiality
Catchword: -
Cited cases: G 0001/05 G 0002/08 J 0015/04 T 0954/98
Citing cases: G 0002/07 G 0001/08 G 0001/18 G 0001/19 G 0002/19 G 0003/19 G 0001/21 G 0001/24 R 0001/10 R 0019/12 J 0025/10 J 0009/21 J 0005/23 T 0784/06 T 0979/06 T 1326/06 T 1402/06 T 1658/06 T 1784/06 T 0384/07 T 1244/07 T 1806/07 T 1875/07 T 2048/07 T 2050/07 T 0102/08 T 0506/08 T 1421/08 T 1741/08 T 1962/08 T 0365/09 T 0571/09 T 1265/09 T 1358/09 T 1539/09 T 1782/09 T 2063/09 T 0313/10 T 0759/10 T 1211/10 T 1769/10 T 2270/10 T 0631/11 T 0779/11 T 1370/11 T 1379/11 T 1498/11 T 1965/11 T 1981/11 T 0414/12 T 1461/12 T 2049/12 T 2101/12 T 0646/13 T 1073/13 T 1082/13 T 1434/13 T 2330/13 T 0171/14 T 0489/14 T 0543/14 T 0552/14 T 0598/14 T 0944/15 T 1384/15 T 1668/15 T 1807/15 T 0199/16 T 0426/16 T 0817/16 T 0818/16 T 2147/16 T 2314/16 T 2379/16 T 2448/16 T 2522/16 T 0697/17 T 1089/17 T 1091/17 T 1241/17 T 1924/17 T 2021/17 T 2027/17 T 2156/17 T 2386/17 T 0504/18 T 0505/18 T 0755/18 T 1287/18 T 1607/18 T 1636/18 T 1639/18 T 1822/18 T 2263/18 T 2366/18 T 2431/18 T 2849/18 T 0288/19 T 0524/19 T 0698/19 T 1049/19 T 1449/19 T 2626/19 T 2804/19 T 2825/19 T 2852/19 T 0801/20 T 1171/20 T 1272/20 T 1903/20 T 2170/21 T 0417/22 T 0980/22 T 0591/23 T 1297/23 T 1676/23

Order

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. The request of Mr Schultz is rejected as inadmissible.

2. The composition of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case G 3/08 remains unchanged.