T 0099/85 (Diagnostic Agent) of 23.10.1986
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T009985.19861023
- Date of decision
- 23 October 1986
- Case number
- T 0099/85
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 80101187.5
- IPC class
- G01N 33/52
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- Boehringer
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.4.01
- Headnote
1. If a document does not contain details of the size of particles (here: particles of a filler in a film) a specific size range is not implicitly disclosed if it is common knowledge among persons skilled in the art that particles whose size lies clearly outside this range may also be used for the known purpose (here: as a filler).
2. In order to assess inventive step, the problem must be defined objectively in such a way that it does not partially anticipate the solution (with reference to T 229/85, OJ EPO 1987,237).
3. In the opposition proceedings there is no reason officially to insist on a change in the wording of the claim simply because one feature in the preamble to a two-part claim does not belong to the state of the art (Rule 29(1)(a) EPC).
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 52(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 54(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention R 29(1) 1973
- Keywords
- Novelty - implicit
Formulation of the problem
Delimitation in the opposition proceedings - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0429/88T 0065/89T 0187/89T 0422/89T 0457/89T 0033/90T 0100/90T 0247/90T 0705/90T 0116/91T 0393/92T 0412/92T 0787/92T 0753/93T 0876/93T 0955/93T 0248/94T 0146/95T 0059/96T 0327/96T 0422/96T 0840/96T 0986/96T 1018/96T 1051/96T 0313/97T 0741/97T 0793/97T 0841/97T 0900/97T 0925/98T 0140/00T 0184/00T 0408/00T 0946/00T 0026/01T 0177/01T 0464/01T 0311/02T 0504/02T 0235/03T 0714/03T 0221/05T 1633/06T 0079/07T 0116/08T 0879/08T 1495/09T 0793/11
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal is rejected.