European Patent Office

T 0099/85 (Diagnostic Agent) of 23.10.1986

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:1986:T009985.19861023
Date of decision
23 October 1986
Case number
T 0099/85
Petition for review of
-
Application number
80101187.5
IPC class
G01N 33/52
Language of proceedings
German
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Download
-
Other decisions for this case
-
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
-
Applicant name
Boehringer
Opponent name
-
Board
3.4.01
Headnote

1. If a document does not contain details of the size of particles (here: particles of a filler in a film) a specific size range is not implicitly disclosed if it is common knowledge among persons skilled in the art that particles whose size lies clearly outside this range may also be used for the known purpose (here: as a filler).

2. In order to assess inventive step, the problem must be defined objectively in such a way that it does not partially anticipate the solution (with reference to T 229/85, OJ EPO 1987,237).

3. In the opposition proceedings there is no reason officially to insist on a change in the wording of the claim simply because one feature in the preamble to a two-part claim does not belong to the state of the art (Rule 29(1)(a) EPC).

Keywords
Novelty - implicit
Formulation of the problem
Delimitation in the opposition proceedings
Catchword
-
Cited cases
-

ORDER

For these reasons, it is decided that:

The appeal is rejected.