G 0002/08 of 15.06.2009

European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EP:BA:2009:G000208.20090615
Date of decision: 15 June 2009
Case number: G 0002/08
Petition for review of: -
Application number: 94306847.8
IPC class: A61K 31/445
Language of proceedings: English
Distribution: Distributed to board chairmen and members (B)
Download: Decision in English
OJ versions: No OJ links found
Other decisions for this case: G 0002/08 Dosierungsanleitung/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY 2010-02-19 G 0002/08 Dosage regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY 2010-02-19 G 0002/08 Posologie/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY 2010-02-19 G 0002/08 Dosage regime/ABBOTT RESPIRATORY 2010-02-19
Abstracts for this decision: -
Application title: Nicotinic acid compositions for treating hyperlipidemia
Applicant name: Abbott Respiratory LLC
Opponent name: -
Board: -
Headnote: -
Relevant legal provisions: ECHR, De Cubber v. Belgium, 26 October 1984; ETTL v. Austria, 23 April 1987; Hauschildt v. Denmark, 24 May 1989; Academy Trading Ltd et al. v. Greece, 4 April 2000European Patent Convention Art 24 European Patent Convention Art 24 1973Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 4
Keywords: Objection to a member of the EBA, suspicion of partiality
Catchword: -
Cited cases: G 0001/86 G 0005/91 G 0009/91 G 0010/91 G 0001/99 G 0001/05 J 0015/04 T 0954/98
Citing cases: G 0003/08 G 0001/09 G 0002/12 G 0002/13 G 0001/18 G 0003/19 G 0001/21 G 0002/21 R 0012/09 R 0002/12 R 0019/12 R 0002/14 T 1319/04 T 1283/05 T 0578/06 T 0795/06 T 0826/06 T 1242/06 T 1918/06 T 0047/07 T 0294/07 T 0566/07 T 1827/07 T 1760/08 T 1838/08 T 2003/08 T 0108/09 T 1046/09 T 1075/09 T 1099/09 T 1138/09 T 1570/09 T 1627/09 T 1635/09 T 1955/09 T 0773/10 T 2369/10 T 0524/11 T 0677/11 T 1021/11 T 1069/11 T 1554/11 T 1577/11 T 1673/11 T 1760/11 T 1869/11 T 0734/12 T 1184/12 T 1780/12 T 2017/12 T 2473/12 T 2506/12 T 0177/13 T 0714/13 T 0943/13 T 1819/13 T 1889/13 T 0013/14 T 0015/14 T 0799/14 T 0899/14 T 1758/15 T 1824/15 T 0664/16 T 0694/16 T 0857/16 T 1186/16 T 2440/16 T 2707/16 T 1243/17 T 1991/17 T 0779/18 T 1287/18 T 1345/18 T 1732/18 T 0339/19 T 0634/19 T 0935/19 T 0968/19 T 1868/19 T 2360/19 T 2516/19 T 2689/19 T 2805/19 T 0468/20 T 0558/20 T 1252/20 T 1047/21 T 1356/21 T 1357/21 T 1863/21 T 0160/22 T 0295/22 T 0815/22 T 1259/22 T 1390/22 T 2012/22 T 0278/23 T 0867/23 T 1874/23 T 0197/24 T 0792/24

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

- The request of ... acting on behalf of ... is rejected as inadmissible.

- ... remains a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal in case ....