European Patent Office

G 0001/05 (Exclusion and objection/XXX) of 07.12.2006

European Case Law Identifier
ECLI:EP:BA:2006:G000105.20061207
Date of decision
7 December 2006
Case number
G 0001/05
Petition for review of
T 0039/03 2005-08-26
Application number
99100131.4
IPC class
H01L 31/18
Language of proceedings
English
Distribution
Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
Abstracts for this decision
-
Application title
Improved columnar-grained polycrystalline solar cell and process of manufacture
Applicant name
ASTROPOWER Inc.
Opponent name
-
Board
-
Headnote

I. If a member of a Board of Appeal in a notice of withdrawal gives a ground which may by its nature constitute a possible ground for an objection of partiality that ground should normally be respected by the decision on replacement of the Board member concerned (Reasons, point 7).

II. As regards proceedings before the Enlarged Board of Appeal and unless there are specific circumstances throwing doubt on the Board member's ability to approach the parties' submissions with an open mind on a later occasion there cannot be any objectively justified, i.e. reasonable suspicion of partiality against a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal within the meaning of Article 24(3), first sentence, EPC for the reason that a position on the matter was adopted in a prior decision of a Board of Appeal in which the Board member concerned had participated (Reasons, point 27).

Relevant legal provisions
BDS Art 2(3)Codice di procedura civile (IT) Art 51Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms Art 6(1)ECHR R_028(2)(a)ECHR R_028(2)(d)ECHR R_028(3)ECHR: Piersack v. Belgium (1982) of 1 October 1982, Series A, 5 E.H.C.R.169European Patent Convention Art 105(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 112(1)(a) 1973European Patent Convention Art 123(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(1) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(2) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(3) 1973European Patent Convention Art 24(4) 1973European Patent Convention Art 76(1) 1973European Patent Convention R 66(2)(g) 1973Federal Constitution (AT) Art 87(3)Federal Constitution (CH) Art 30(1)Federal Constitution (DE) Art 101(i) 2Jurisdiktionsnorm (AT) §20Patentgesetz (AT) §76Puolitaival and Pirttiaho v. Finland of 23 November 2004, No. 54857RPBA_Art_013_Sent_3Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 13Rules of procedure of the Boards of Appeal Art 15Rules of procedure of the Enlarged Board of Appeal Art 1(2)UK: Locabail (UK) v. Bayfield Properties Ltd, [2000] QB 451, Jones v. DAS Legal Expenses Insurance Co Ltd [2004] I.R.L.R. 218, CAZivilprozessordnung (DE) §41
Keywords
Notice of withdrawal under Article 24(2) EPC - requirements for replacement of a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal - Suspicion of partiality against a member of the Enlarged Board of Appeal - merely based on participation of that member in a prior decision of a Board of Appeal having taken a position on the matter - suspicion not justified on an objective basis
Catchword
-

ORDER

For these reasons it is decided that:

1. Ms X is replaced by Mr Alting van Geusau.

2. The objection under Article 24(3) EPC against Mr Y is rejected.