T 0024/81 (Metal refining) of 13.10.1982
- European Case Law Identifier
- ECLI:EP:BA:1982:T002481.19821013
- Date of decision
- 13 October 1982
- Case number
- T 0024/81
- Petition for review of
- -
- Application number
- 79101414.5
- IPC class
- -
- Language of proceedings
- German
- Distribution
- Published in the EPO's Official Journal (A)
- Download
- -
- Other decisions for this case
- -
- Abstracts for this decision
- -
- Application title
- -
- Applicant name
- BASF
- Opponent name
- -
- Board
- 3.3.01
- Headnote
I. Objectivity in the assessment of inventive step is achieved by starting out from the objectively ruling state of the art, in the light of which the technical problem is determined which the invention addresses and solves from an objective point of view, and consideration is given to the question of the obviousness of the disclosed solution to this problem as seen by the man skilled in the art and having those capabilities which can be objectively expected of him. In contrast a mere investigation for indications of the presence of inventive step is no substitute for the technically skilled assessment of the invention vis-a-vis the state of the art, pursuant to Article 56 EPC. Where such indications are present, the overall picture of the state of the art and consideration of all significant factors may show that inventive step is involved, but will not necessarily do so. A process developed in the light of a need which arose relatively shortly before the application is not deemed to involve inventive step if this need could be readily met by an obvious combination of teachings from the state of the art.
II. When examining for inventive step, the state of the art must be assessed from the point of view of the man skilled in the art at the time of priority relevant for the application. Consequently all previously published embodiments must be taken into consideration which offered a suggestion to the skilled practitioner for solving the problem addressed, even where those embodiments were not particularly emphasised.
- Relevant legal provisions
- European Patent Convention Art 56 1973European Patent Convention R 27(1)(d) 1973
- Keywords
- Determination of technical problem
Inventive step - technical problem - objective assessment
Inventive step - need
Inventive step - skilled in the art - Catchword
- -
- Cited cases
- -
- Citing cases
- T 0011/87T 0136/87T 0173/87T 0408/87T 0079/88T 0352/88T 0578/88T 0579/88T 0289/89T 0338/89T 0346/89T 0565/89T 0020/90T 0294/90T 0910/90T 0005/91T 0297/91T 0499/91T 0515/91T 0566/91T 0983/91T 0110/92T 0487/92T 0630/92T 0939/92T 0964/92T 0271/93T 0311/93T 0349/93T 0955/93T 1046/93T 0772/94T 0146/95T 0653/95T 0971/95T 0284/96T 0730/96T 0831/96T 0544/97T 0793/97T 0164/98T 0241/98T 0543/98T 0323/99T 0396/99T 0606/99T 0877/99T 0717/00T 0177/01T 1285/01T 0632/02T 1232/03T 1369/04T 0100/05T 0210/05T 0259/05T 0260/05T 1039/05T 1145/05T 1548/05T 1633/06T 0339/07T 1397/07T 1859/07T 0610/08T 1951/08T 2119/08T 0067/09T 0687/09T 2076/09T 1080/10T 1590/10T 1631/10T 1758/10T 0028/11T 0301/12T 1011/13
ORDER
For these reasons, it is decided that:
The appeal against the Decision of the Examining Division of the European Patent Office dated 17 February 1981 is rejected.